As in our model
the neutron
is similar to mini-atom of hydrogen, their properties should be also similar.
So, at casual rendezvous with a proton,
the neutron should start to be polarized, and on some distance from a proton, its
will transfer to their blanket orbit:
I.e. will enter with it a donor-acceptor bond, known from chemistry.
To determine, where here a neutron and where a proton - now it is impossible.
As a matter of fact, before us a nucleus of deuterium.
Adding now neutrons and protons, it is possible to create all known nuclei of atoms.
The deficit, no less than surplus of
,
shielding a protons close located in a nucleus, should affect strength of a nucleus,
and it will aspire to their some optimum relation by that, or other type of decay.
Similar representation of a nuclear interaction should provide:
- The short-range of a nuclear forces (type Van der Waals forces between atoms);
- Off-center character of nuclear forces;
- The relative charging independence of nuclear forces (a proton-neutron, a neutron-neutron);
- Saturation of nuclear forces.
And two words about energetics.
As is known, the binding energy of nucleons in a nuclear can reach 8,7 Mev/nucleon. Energy of the orbital
in a neutron is equal only 0,78 Mev. I.e. it is much less.
How to be?
In my opinion, as a single decent energy source in a nuclear interaction the spin-spin
interaction of protons can serve. I.e., at a nuclear interaction, protons lose a part
of the kinetic energy of gyration.
